Hearing about how easy it is for potential criminals or
terrorists to find out online how to make explosive devices, seeing posts made
on a public social media site by a friend (aged 14) showing gruesome images,
and knowing how easy it is for young people to access, and potentially even
post, pornographic images over the internet. These things worry me about the
online community nowadays, as it does many people. This raises the view,
amongst many, of filtering of internet content, and who should be responsible.
Currently, the Australian Communications and Media
Authority (ACMA) oversee the filtering of online content. They are tasked with
blocking any content that is Refused Classification, such as child sex abuse content,
bestiality, sexual violence including rape and the detailed instruction of
crime or drug use, and anything rated X. They must also police R18+ rated
content that is without a restricted access system (measures to restrict access
to those ‘authorized’, above 18years of age). For any such content hosted on an
Australian server they can issue a final take down notice. If it is overseas,
their power is limited to adding this content to a list that is provided to ISP’s,
who then have to offer filtering software to their clients.
In December 2009, Stephen Conroy, Minister for Broadband,
Communications and the Digital Economy, issued a press release stating a proposal
for Internet Service Provider’s (ISP’s) to filter any content deemed unsuitable.
In response to this, many organisations, especially the Electronic Frontiers
Australia (EFA) criticized the government’s proposal, calling it, and filtering
in general, ineffective and obstructive. They have stated ’Top-down, one-size-fits-all approaches to
dealing with these challenges, such as the government's now-abandoned mandatory
internet filter, are not appropriate, nor likely to be effective in terms of
outcomes or value for money.’
In my opinion, internet content should be filtered to a
point, and ISP’s should be the ones to filter this content. Essentially, they
are offering a service for money. This service then allows people to access
unsuitable content, which should be stopped by those offering the service, no
matter the cost.
350 Words
http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD.PC/pc=PC_90169#os
– ACMA fact sheet on filtering
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/bsa1992214/
- Broadcasting Services Act 1992
https://www.efa.org.au/Issues/Censor/cens1.html
- EFA fact sheet on censorship
http://www.minister.dbcde.gov.au/media/media_releases/2009/115
- Stephen Conroy’s press release for ISP filtering
No comments:
Post a Comment